The following article is reposted with the permission of T. K. Burk! www.tkburk.com
In Numbers 19:1-22 we find a command for the sacrifice of a red heifer and the usage of its ashes. These verses describe a sacrifice that is unlike any other and that is central to Old Testament purification. For almost two thousand years there has been no red heifer meeting the specifications necessary from which this ash can be made. But recently there are reports of the birth of such a calf in Israel. This has led many Christian preachers that teach the prophecy view of “Dispensationalism” to tell their audiences this calf is a fulfillment of Bible prophecy, whose arrival means the construction of the third Jewish Temple cannot be far behind.
Dispensationalists believe that most of the prophecies about Israel are to be read literally as written. This creates a prophecy view that has God’s plan for Israel being different than His plan for the Gentiles (non-Jews). Their claim about this calf is nothing new for them for they have made the same claims about other red calves in the past. Each time they did this they ignored the obstacles that blocked their predictions. The obstacles I speak of are commandments in the Bible, each of which must be met before any red heifer can fulfill God’s requirements for sacrifice. This study will explain why these requirements have not been met in the past, and why they cannot be met now or at any time in the future.
WHY A RED HEIFER?
I remember when a red calf named Melody was born in Israel in August 1997. The news at that time proclaimed Melody was the first red calf born in centuries that met the biblical stipulations. It was expected that once she reached age she would be sacrificed to create the red heifer ashes necessary for Jewish purification. This hubbub didn’t last long because as Melody grew, the rabbis found her sprouting different colored hairs. The result of her not being a true redhead made Melody’s ashes unkosher for ritual purification.
Jewish tradition in the Talmud says there have been nine red heifers sacrificed to date. The last of these around 15-16 AD. It also teaches that the tenth red heifer (which is to be the last) is made into ash by the Messiah. This is to happen at a time when the third Jewish Temple is built. The Torah requires a small portion of red heifer ash be mixed with clean running water to ritually cleanse the impurity associated with being near or touching a dead body (see Number 19:1-22). The Temple Institute of Israel is an organization dedicated to the rebuilding of the third Jewish temple. Its International Director, Rabbi Chaim Richman, said this about the biblical necessity of purification:
“The ceremony of the Red Heifer is a purification or cleansing ceremony. G-D is approachable in the pure state. He demands it. Purification is a ceremonial process by which ‘things’ are made holy that one may approach G-D Who is holy. For this purpose are the ashes of the Red Heifer to be used. The physical ashes of the Red Heifer according to G-D have the ability to make a thing or person ceremonially pure or clean.
The opposite of purity is impurity. Everything is impure until ‘cleansed’ with the purifying ashes of the Red Heifer. In the impure state a thing cannot approach G-D. The ashes of the Red Heifer ‘purify by making a thing ceremonially clean as commanded by G-D. Only by the ashes of the Red Heifer can G-D’s Holy Temple which is a House of Prayer be approached to obtain Spiritual Purity through prayer.” (Chaim Richman, The Mystery of The Red Heifer, Understanding The Concept of Biblical Purity)
Notice that Richman explained that purity is needed to make the impure pure. Thus, he believes a pure red heifer must be sacrificed to resupply these ashes before any Jew can begin the building the third temple. This would be a completely red animal with no defects and has never worn a yoke (see Numbers 19:2). The last red heifer ashes were lost during the 70 AD destruction of the Second Temple. As a result, every Jew from that time until now is considered ritually unclean according to Old Testament Law. Because of this absence, Rabbis like Richman have been waiting on an animal to be born that can fulfill God’s command for purification.
The red heifer is chosen by the purity of its coloring. To date every calf thought to qualify was later disqualified because they did not meet rabbinical scrutiny. But even if a red heifer is found acceptable, only a priest that is ceremonially clean can prepare it for its ashes. Such purification requires the sprinkling of the ashes of a red heifer (see Numbers 19:9). Without these ashes, no priest is ceremonially clean, which means, no priest can burn a red heifer for its ashes. So, a priest cannot burn a red heifer to make red heifer ashes unless he is first cleansed by the ashes of a red heifer. This endless cycle makes the birth of a red heifer, without already having the ashes of a red heifer, a Catch-22.
So, when Prophecy Teachers print in their magazines or broadcast on their radio or TV shows that furnishings, garments, and red heifers are being readied for a “third Jewish Temple,” just remember that these things mean nothing without a purified red-heifer-ash-washed priest. I will next explain why a cow not being a true redhead is not the only thing standing in the way of it becoming red heifer ash.
LINEAGE NEEDED TO BE A JEWISH PRIEST
Before a red heifer can be made into purifying ash, there must be priests with a written lineage to prove they have a pure Hebrew bloodline (see Exodus 6:14-25; Numbers 3:1-5, Numbers 3:17-39, Numbers 26:57-61; Nehemiah 7:4-73; Nehemiah 12:1-26; Matthew 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38). Such written lineage is important since God disqualifies any priest, and his offspring, from serving at His Temple if his blood is intermingled with gentile blood (see Nehemiah 7:5, Nehemiah 7:63-64; Ezra 2:61-62, Ezra 10:11-19). If you’re one that believes a written lineage establishing a “pure Jewish bloodline” back to Abraham and Adam still exists, ask yourself why the lineage for the priest candidates in Rabbi Richman’s Temple Institute is researched only back to their great-grandfather. This is where this practice is admitted:
“Kohanim, priests directly descended from Moses’s brother Aaron, are recognized by the Institute as such IF THEIR PATERNAL GRANDFATHER OBSERVED THE TRADITION.” (Jerusalem Post, Third Temple Preparations begin with Priestly Garb, 2008)
Tracking your lineage to your “paternal grandfather” would in no way satisfy what is biblically commanded to qualify a man to be a Jewish priest.
Since no written lineage exists today, some preachers claim that DNA can be substituted as evidence. DNA experts would disagree for they know there is no test that can prove the purity of a bloodline. Thus, there is no test that gives absolute proof of a pure Cohen bloodline going back to Aaron’s priestly family and beyond. Therefore, DNA evidence cannot meet God’s stipulations for qualifying a person for the Levitical priesthood. This 60 Minute’s broadcast focused on the good and bad of DNA testing:
“‘This business of genetic genealogy is fraught with limitations. For one thing, it can only provide information about a tiny fraction of our ancestry. Because we get half our DNA from our mothers and half from our fathers, almost all of our DNA gets shuffled and remixed every generation, making it impossible to trace what comes from whom. There are just two bits of DNA that remain pure – the ‘Y’ chromosome, which passes directly from father to son, and something called ‘mitochondrial DNA’, which passes unchanged from mother to child.’
Hank Greely, a law professor at Stanford University, has studied this new field. He worries that people don’t realize just how many ancestors they actually have.
‘Eight generations ago both you and I had 256 great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.’ Wait, you’re saying if you go back eight generations we have 256 great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents? ‘Yes, it doubles every generation. So you’ve got two parents. You have four grandparents. You have eight great grandparents. Sixteen great-great grandparents. And it adds up fast. It adds up so fast in fact that if you go back 20 generations you’ve got over a million grandparents.’
1,048,576 to be exact. And in each generation, DNA testing can provide information about only two of them.
‘So you could be Peruvian on your mother’s mother’s mother’s side. Japanese on your father’s father’s father’s side. Swedish on everything else.’ And you’ll never know. ‘You’ll never know the Swedish from the ‘Y’ chromosome from the mitochondrial DNA.’” (60 Minutes, Rebuilding the Family Tree)
Not only do those candidates hoping to perform animal sacrifices or become the Jewish High Priest need a written lineage proving they have a pure Kohanim bloodline, but more specifically, they must prove they are from the priestly line of Zadok (see Ezekiel 43:19, Ezekiel 44:15-17, Ezekiel 48:11-12). Why a lineage from Zadok? It is no coincidence that the name Zadok means “righteousness.” It appears his descendants were chosen because of Zadok’s faithfulness to David’s throne. He stood with David during the time of Absalom’s rebellion (see 2 Samuel 15:24-29). He also stood with Solomon in preference to Adonijah (see 1 Kings 1:8, 1 Kings 1:39). Because of his fidelity, God made Zadok’s decedents the exclusive line of priests to serve at the altar of sacrifice and in the office of High Priest.
The dilemma for Dispensational teachers is there is no such written lineage to prove who is and who is not of the priestly line of Zadok. DNA testing certainly cannot do this. Nevertheless, the Bible demands a proven lineage, for, without it, there can be no purification from the ashes of a red heifer…ashes which only a Zadok priest can prepare…and the problem goes around and around and around (see Numbers 19:3–10).
Names on tombstones, DNA testing, and tracing one’s family tree back to a paternal grandfather does not satisfy the command for carefully documented genealogy like those found in the book of Numbers, Matthew 1, and Luke 3. Regarding priestly genealogy, the following quote is from Rabbi Alfred J. Kolatch. He has authored about 50 books including The Jewish Home Advisor, This is the Torah, and Jewish Book of Why. In His book, Inside Judaism: The Concepts, Customs, And Celebrations of the Jewish People, he writes:
“Despite the acceptance of proselytes the equals of unborn Jews, in Jewish Law certain limitations are placed upon the convert, the most oppressive being that of a priest (Cohen) may not marry a convert, although a daughter of a Cohen may marry a convert. The reason offered is since early proselytes came from heathen stock, they were considered tainted. Therefore, a priest, who was expected to be as unblemished as the sacrifice he offered on the altar, was not permitted to marry a woman whose past life might reflect negatively on his character, or stigmatize his offspring.
Today, only the orthodox community abides by these restitutions. The position taken by the Rabbinical Assembly (Conservative) is that since today’s priests in general are of uncertain genealogy and there is no way to prove they that they are descendants of the family of Aaron of the tribe of Levi, the ruling has lost its validity. They also argue that it is unfair and even embarrassing to admit a female proselyte to the Jewish fold, but then to deny her the right to marry a Cohen, based on a regulation that might have had validity when the Temple existed but is no longer a factor in Jewish life. The reestablishment of the Temple, they argue, is not anticipated. The Reform and Reconstructionist rabbinate share the Conservative view.” – Inside Judaism: The Concepts, Customs, And Celebrations of the Jewish People, Alfred J. Kolatch, The Priestly Family, page 135
Did you see that Kolatch admitted that today “There is no way to prove that they are descendants of the family of Aaron of the tribe of Levi”? That should be enough to silence those Christians claiming this newly born red heifer is evidence of a soon to be built third Temple—but, shockingly, it is not.
Now that I’ve shared why no red calf will ever align with Bible prophecy, let’s look at how Bible prophecy is already fulfilled through its sacrifice.
BETTER THAN A RED HEIFER
Jesus made it clear that the Old Testament is a God-inspired work that speaks of Him (see John 5:39, John 5:46; Luke 24:27 and Hebrews 10:7; Acts 26:22). Much of what is written in the Torah serves as a type and shadow of what Jesus came to do. The book of Hebrews speaks of how Jesus both fulfilled and superseded things like angels, the Sabbath, the High Priest, Melchisedec, the Tabernacle and its furnishings, and Old Testament animal sacrifices. There is no reason to think what Number 19 says about the red heifer and its sacrifice is any different. Therefore, the red heifer there was expected to be fulfilled by the (then coming) Messiah. While under the inspiration of God’s Spirit, the writer of Hebrews penned these words:
“For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.” (Hebrews 9:13-14, ESV)
Jesus did fulfill what the red heifer and its ashes are said to do, but His sacrifice does that and yet so much more! Here are some examples of this:
- The red heifer had to be free from blemishes. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. Here’s a partial list of those who examined Jesus and declared Him blemish free: John the Baptist (John 1:29-30), Pilate (see Luke 23:4, Luke 23:14), Herod (Luke 23:15), the Apostle Peter (see 1 Peter 1:19, 1 Peter 2:22), and the High Priest and Jewish Sanhedrin found Him so blemish free they were forced to seek false witnesses to bring false accusations (see Matthew 26:59-60).
- The red heifer was sacrificed a distance from the Temple. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. After Pilate pronounced his decision, Jesus was led away to “Calvary,” which is also called “Golgotha” (see Matthew 27:33; Mark 15:22; John 19:17) and “the Skull” (see Luke 23:33). His cross stood a short distance outside Jerusalem and her temple, thus He suffered outside the camp (see Hebrews 13:12).
- The red heifer sacrifice was a perplexity and not easily understood. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does (see 1 Corinthians 1:18, 1 Corinthians 1:23). The red heifer sacrifice stumped the sages. They could not understand how the priest making the sacrifice was ritually unclean while the one sprinkled was ritually clean. Their confusion was because they did not understand the substance of this sacrifice would be fulfilled in Jesus. The pure being made impure is when Jesus, who knew no sin, took sin upon Himself on the cross. This action made sinners [the impure] into sinless saints [the pure] (see Hebrews 9:11-28; 2 Corinthians 4:3; 2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Peter 2:24). This aligns to the command that the red heifer have a perfect coat of red. The color red is viewed as symbolically speaking of sin. Only through Jesus can red be made white like snow (see Isaiah 1:18; Revelation 7:14). And, like the red heifer’s sacrifice included an emphasis on its blood, Jesus’ blood is what washes away the stains of sin (see 1 John 1:7; Revelation 1:5).
- The red heifer sacrifice was a type of cleansing for Leprosy. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. The Bible requires items used to cleanse a leper be burned with the red heifer sacrifice. These were cedar wood, scarlet yarn, and hyssop (see Leviticus 14:4). Biblically, leprosy is a type of sin. Jesus became all that is needed to cleanse a man or woman of their sin (see Matthew 8:3; Mark 1:42; Luke 5:12-13; Psalms 51:7).
- When red heifer ashes are mixed with fresh running water (living water) they create “water of separation.” Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. (see Numbers 19:9, Numbers 19:17). The “separation” in Numbers 19:9 is the Hebrew word “niddah” (H5079). In the Torah, niddah speaks of a woman’s impurity during her menstrual cycle. The following verse has the prophet Zechariah speaking of a time when a coming purification would cleanse the people of God from their niddah: “On that day there shall be a fountain opened for the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse them from sin and uncleanness (niddah)” (Zechariah 13:1 ESV). Jesus is that fountain (see 1 Peter 1:2; Hebrews 12:24; Revelation 1:5). The “water of separation” created a means by which God’s people are made clean from their impurity of sin and its death (see Ephesians 5:25-6; Hebrews 10:22).
- The red heifer was unique, for it is the only sacrifice in the Torah that cleansed a person from their nearness or contact with death. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. A corpse is symbolic of sin and death. Jesus’ sacrifice cleanses those who are Born Again in Jesus name from their sin and the death that accompanies sin (see John 3:5; Mark 16:15; Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; Acts 22:16). As a result, the sacrifice and purification Jesus provides is unlike anything found in the Bible (see Luke 1:35; John 1:1-2, John 1:14; Matthew 17:5).
- The Talmud has the tenth red heifer being sacrificed by the Messiah when the third Temple is built. Does this describe Jesus? Yes, it does. Though the Talmud is not inspired scripture, Jesus’ sacrifice did occur before the building of the third Temple (see John 2:19). Remember, Jesus never prophesied of the building of a stone and wood third temple. Neither did any of His apostles. What they did speak of is a New Covenant Temple that would be built from “lively stones,” which means, it is built from the assembly of Jesus’ believers. This new building would be the place where God dwells (see John 14:15-17, John 14:23; 1 Corinthians 3:16, 1 Corinthians 6:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; Ephesians 2:18-22; Hebrews 3:6; 1 Peter 2:5).
The sacrifice of the red heifer and its ashes did make the defiled ceremonially clean. However, the purification spoken of in the Law, Psalms, and Prophets would be a cleansing that would come through the prophesied Messiah. This is not a yet unfulfilled promise since it is already available through the Messiah, Jesus Christ!
A FINAL WORD
While working for a prophecy magazine some years ago, I had the opportunity to talk with some Jewish men who have devoted their lives to building the third Jewish temple. These men are often known by Dispensational teachers who teach a “soon coming” third temple. However, none of these men had access to the things necessary before this temple can biblically begin. Though this is true, the organizations these men represent are partly funded by well-meaning Christians. Make no mistake, when the first and second Jewish temples existed, they stood as God’s salvation plan to mankind. Hence, if a third temple is built it will represent the same. So, how can a believer financially support the rebuilding of the Old Covenant system of animal sacrifice and also say they believe Jesus’ sacrifice replaced that system with a better New Covenant plan of salvation? I ask this because the core message in these two testimonies is clearly at odds with each other (read 2 John 1:10-11).
I am hoping those who have read this study can now agree with what Jewish Rabbis know to be true, which is, there exists today no written lineage proving a pure bloodline of Zadok, and without such evidence, no man can meet the specifications God established for becoming a Jewish priest. What this means is nothing relating to red heifers, red heifer ashes, or the building of the third Jewish Temple or its furnishings can be described as a “fulfillment of Bible prophecy,” or even as one that is “the greatest fulfillment since the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.” That said, there is a prophecy message still needing to be told, which is that the tenth and last red heifer has already been born and sacrificed for the purification of those defiled by the death and uncleanness of this world. This purification was not fulfilled by a red cow named Melody, or by any other animal, but instead, it comes through the name of the prophesied Messiah, Jesus Christ!
© 2018 TK Burk. All Rights Reserved.
- World Without End – Amen! - February 18, 2019
- The Binding of Satan - October 3, 2018
- Holy Cow, another Red Calf! - September 27, 2018
Having written the scenario in my previous post I wish to follow it up with an other post. The following scripture is also for the believer today. Mat 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Understand This: 2Co_6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Understand… Read more »
Thanks for your comments. Matthew 24:15 was fulfilled when Roman General Titus entered the Temple. He displayed his pagan ensigns. His soldiers worshiped him as a God. Read the works of Josephus – he was an eyewitness to the destruction of the Temple.
Very good and true study but I wish to bring forward an other scenario. The anti-Christ is to sit in the temple where he ought not.The anti -Christ will deceive the whole world because he professes to be the Christ and the scriptures say he will even perform miracles. There would be no need for a red heifer nor a priest of the descendants of Aron. The priesthood of Aron the Levitates are replaced by the priesthood of Melchizedek which Christ is. If the temple is built at that time the false Christ having deceived the world into believing he… Read more »
Thanks for commenting. In regard to “Anti-Christ” please read my articles on that subject. Read all 4 scriptures in 1st and 2nd John that contain the words “antichrist” or “antichrists”. You will see that John never described “antichrist” in the manner you are proposing. Daniel never said that “the anti-Christ is to sit in the temple”. You have substituted “anti-Christ” for the word “he”. The “he” is the “Messiah”.
I have never been able to understand Christians supporting a rebuilding of the third temple. I’ve often wondered if they have really read and understood the Book of Hebrews that clearly shows such would be an insult to the precious Blood of Jesus that was shed for our sins(Hebrews 9:11-28). I know true born again Spirit-filled people who believe this, and sometimes I would wonder…maybe I’m the one deceived. But then once again I’m drawn to the Scriptures…and I know God’s Word is Truth. I know there is ONE plan of salvation…for Jew and Gentile…and it’s through the shed blood… Read more »